Once Papper showed that the bone marrow space could be used with comparable success to administer IV fluids and drugs, intraosseous infusion was popularized during World War II in order to prevent soldiers' death via hemorrhagic shock. Emanuel Papper and others then continued to advocate, research, and make advances on behalf of IO administration. Because of Tocantins and O'Neill's success in their experiments with rabbits, human clinical trials were established using mainly the body of the sternum or the manubrium for access. To continue the expansion of knowledge regarding IO administration, a successful blood transfusion took place in 1940 using the sternum, and afterwards, in 1941, Tocantins and O'Neill demonstrated successful vascular access using the bone marrow cavity of a long bone in rabbits. saw that bone, specifically the sternum, could also be used as a route of administration for emergency purposes. The use of the IV route to administer fluids has been around since the 1830s, and, in 1922, Cecil K. Intraosseous infusions are used when people have compromised intravenous access and need immediate delivery of life-saving fluids and medications. The IO route of fluid and medication administration is an alternative to the preferred intravascular route when the latter cannot be established in a timely manner in emergent situations. Intraosseous infusions allow for the administered medications and fluids to go directly into the vascular system. The intraosseous infusion technique is used to provide fluids and medication when intravenous access is not available or not feasible. They got a lot of easy, easy, buckets at the rim, and when you're trying to make a run, that's demoralizing.Intraosseous infusion ( IO) is the process of injecting medications, fluids, or blood products directly into the marrow of a bone this provides a non-collapsible entry point into the systemic venous system. I just feel like we may have been a little lackluster down the stretch it showed. I feel like they made their cuts hard, they ran their offense hard. Regardless, I feel like their energy on both ends was better than ours, and it showed especially on the defensive end. We started out the half, I believe, with two backdoors, one of them on me, and someone else. “I think it may have been a snowball effect. On what went wrong with the team’s defense I think when I did do that though, we got some open clean looks, but you know, we have to deal with it.” There are a couple times I went up and got blocked, I should have passed it out. Two seven-footers, that’s tough to go against. If you’re not tough enough to deal with whatever the environment is, you’re not going to get anywhere as a team. Again, if you need a crowd to win games, you’re not going anywhere. On takeaways from crowd environment with Arizona fans If we learn that lesson, then today will be worth it. Last year, we were the tougher team in March for a lot of games and that’s why we went where we went. I told out guys in the locker room, ‘The only way we’re going to learn from this is if we can look in the mirror and admit what happened from that run.’. That’s hard for me to say, but that’s the truth. I wouldn’t trade them, but they were the tougher team. If my teams have gone down, it’s because the other team’s just got better players. And as hard as it is for me to swallow – because I’ve made a career of never losing because of that. When you’re playing great teams, it just becomes a test of two wills. Our defense broke down we gave up back doors. “From that point on, they just played harder. On what shifted during Arizona’s 15-2 run to take the lead in the second half When they rotate to block a shot, you need to pass the ball to the open man.” And we had 11 shots blocked – we didn’t pass the ball. I didn’t get it across to the team, so that’s my fault. We were minus 11 in assist total, so we didn’t get the job done. “Their length’s always an issue, but in the art of war, you use the other team’s strength against them. On Arizona’s length becoming an issue down the stretch But a lot of that has to do with their talent level, so congratulations to them. But you give up 40 points in the paint and 23 free throws, you’re not beating anybody, let alone a team as good as Arizona. Hopefully, we’ll watch film and learn a lot about what it takes to beat a great team. Our defense left a lot to be desired, to say the very least. That’s where the game was decided they were more physical. “Arizona was the tougher team down the stretch. Mick Cronin, The Michael Price Family UCLA Men’s Head Basketball Coach
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |